In short. Google's site reputation policy addresses third-party content published mainly to benefit from a host website's established ranking signals.
Definition: As of 17 October 2026, Google's spam policies cover site reputation abuse under the heading "Site reputation policy": third-party content is published on a host website mainly to benefit from its established ranking signals. Third-party content is material created by an entity separate from the host website.
Key facts
- Google's site reputation policy distinguishes publishing third-party content from exploiting the host's ranking signals. Its examples of third parties include freelancers and services supplying content under a host's brand.
- Google's Manual Actions report documentation directs website owners to the affected page patterns listed in Search Console messages when identifying inconsistent content.
- Google's AI features documentation requires pages to be indexed and eligible for a Search snippet before they can appear as supporting links in AI Overviews or AI Mode.
What content falls within the policy?
Google's spam policies give the example of an educational website hosting sponsored payday-loan reviews supplied by a third party that distributes the same page elsewhere. Another example is a medical website hosting a low-quality casino advertisement placed there to benefit from the host's ranking signals.
The same documentation lists syndicated news, forums, comments and editorial columns among examples consistent with the policy. It also includes advertising intended to reach the publication's readers and pages using appropriately treated affiliate links. These are non-exhaustive examples. The purpose and integration of the hosted content matter when assessing an arrangement.
How does Google assess editorial integration?
Google's detailed guidance says human review examines whether the host's input, editorial oversight or contribution makes the content fully integrated with the main website. Factors include consistency of presentation and quality, acknowledged authorship or responsibility, and duplication across other websites. No individual factor determines the outcome alone.
A coupon section created with a specialist partner illustrates an arrangement where Google says action is unlikely. The example includes publisher-specific curation, links from the publication, disclosed editorial responsibility and a contact route for problems. A separate example describes original cooking articles from an identified freelancer, with clear editorial responsibility and presentation consistent with the publication.
What happens to affected pages?
Google's policy distinguishes consequences by the search user's location. Outside the European Economic Area (EEA), affected pages may receive a manual action, a measure following human review. Within the EEA, pages may be categorized separately from the main domain and ranked independently, without the impact of that manual action.
Google sends notices through the Manual actions report and Search Console message center. Website owners can address the issue or appeal through a reconsideration request.
The Manual Actions report guidance lists options including removing inconsistent content, reworking it as first-party content or excluding it from indexing. Moving it into another subdirectory or subdomain may leave the underlying issue unresolved and can be treated as circumvention. The guidance explicitly states that failure to take these steps in the EEA is not itself circumvention.
How can a page be excluded from indexing?
Google's noindex documentation describes a rule that prevents indexing by supporting search engines. For an HTML page, the following tag belongs in its <head>:
<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Google must be able to crawl the page to read the rule, so blocking that URL in robots.txt prevents this method from working. Excluding content from indexing is one option in Google's manual-action guidance. The site reputation policy states that a manual action outside the EEA creates no obligation to apply noindex.
Related terms
FAQ
Does hiring a freelance writer violate the policy?
Google's policy examples include original freelance articles that are consistent with the policy. Its cooking-section example identifies the author and publisher's editorial responsibility, with content created specifically for that publication.
Where can you check an affected section?
You can review the affected page patterns in Search Console's Manual Actions report or notification, following Google's report guidance. The same guidance directs you to select "Request Review" after resolving inconsistencies with the policy.
Sources
- Google Search Central, "Spam policies for Google web search", updated 28 August 2026
- Google Search Console Help, "Manual Actions report", accessed 17 October 2026
- Google Search Central, "AI features and your website", updated 10 December 2025
- Google Search Central, "Block Search indexing with noindex", updated 10 December 2025
Check how a page reads to answer engines. Open the GEO score analyzer