Benchmark/panoptic.in/We wrote to the Govt. of Meghalaya against the use of FRT for verification of pensioner's identities
We wrote to the Govt. of Meghalaya against the use of FRT for verification of pensioner's identities
panoptic.in/case-study/we-wrote-to-the-govt-of-meghalaya-against-the-use-of-frt-other753 mots
84.2GEO Score
Excellent : bien optimisé pour la recherche IA
Moyenne du domaine : 85.0
Signaux de citabilité
Forces
Naturalité
92
Qualité structurelle
75
Diversité du contenu
73
À renforcer
Optimisation Q&R
32
Densité de citations
0
Sources citées
0
Autorité réelle des sources
Le classement d'autorité de chaque source citée (au-delà du regex) et le plan d'action détaillé, dans Citead.
Toutes les pages de panoptic.in
Read our response to the Niti Aayog's draft discussion paper on facial recognition technology
otherProject Panoptic has partnered with Amnesty International & Article 19 to launch #BanTheScan in India
otherBrief explainer on Niti Aayog's discussion paper on facial recognition technology
otherFrom investigation to conviction: How does the Police use FRT?
otherThe dangers of DigiYatra & facial recognition enabled paperless air travel #SaveOurPrivacy
other